Font Size:
Theme:

Chapter 236:Zhong Ming's Response

The bell chimes a long microblogging.

"Recently received a lot of feedback on the 'Taiwu Paintings', there is praise, there is criticism, for this, the glare studio is humbly accepting."Because, if the criticism is not free, praise meaningless, "Taiwu Painting" is not only the work of the breeze studio, its success is also inseparable from the support of the players, the players in the game to play a life-long reincarnation of the Taiwu people, enriching this colorful rivers and lakes, so we should accept the criticism and questions raised by the players.

“If I’m a producer of Taigo, I can’t refute any comments from players who don’t like the game, because my position is on the side of the Taiwu Drawer.But today I want to be an ordinary player to put it simply into what I think about a game."

“No game is born to be liked by everyone, like the same movie, a novel, or any cultural product.In other words, there is nothing in the world that is loved by everyone except money.”

"In other words, as a player, you will inevitably encounter games that you don't like, how others like it, how hard you try to play, and you can't like it."This is a normal phenomenon, encounter this kind of game, do not have to force themselves, each game has its own audience group, without your sales, developers will not starve, do not have to bear so much pressure on themselves."

“In my opinion, the evaluation and criticism of a game should not be from your own perspective, but from the perspective of the player who likes it.”

Because no one can represent the opinions of others, in many cases, in fact, we are very few people, but mistakenly think that everyone else is like us.If you look at a problem from your own perspective, it is easy to be biased and it is not possible to make an objective evaluation.”

"If you are only representing the individual, then how to evaluate a game does not matter; but if it is a long-form evaluation, then the most basic is to be fair, the perspective should be correct, otherwise the so-called objective evaluation is just the export of your personal values."

“Someone evaluates the Taiwu Drawer from a personal point of view and dismisses it as worthless and unfun because of personal dislike, which is a typical ‘I am the world’ mistake, that is, wishful thinking that others must feel the same way as yourself, and never really understand why people who like this game like it don’t, and don’t understand that maybe you really care about the problem, which is not a problem with other people.”

"It's ridiculous to say that this game is only suitable for 0.1% of Chinese people."If the so-called feelings really make the 99.9% of the Chinese who don't like the game pay out of pocket, then doing the game is too simple."

“On the contrary, the taste of the players is the most podiatic and the most discerning."Taiwu Painting Book" free download, you can try for 3 days, or a total of 8 hours, or customs clearance of the first sword.During this period, refunds are basically unlimited.In this generous trial scenario, under the higher price of 68 yuan, "Taiwu Painting Book" can complete the first week of 200,000 sales, 40,000 online number, has been enough to show that the players are not Ye Gonglong, verbal touted, but really like this game, willing to pay for this game.

"I hope that in the future under the banner of game evaluation, self-media, can be more based on data analysis problems, rather than on their own preferences, "this game is not fun" argument, because it will appear very, unprofessional."

...

As soon as this long micro-blog was sent out, it immediately caused a lot of retweets!

Some people suspect that this long micro-blog is in response to the real question and answer on the evaluation of the "Taiwu Picture Book" article, because in the long micro-blog, it refers to the data such as "this game is only suitable for 0.1% of Chinese people."

But more players feel that this long micro-blog should be focused on responding to those who have no brain to sing "Taiwu Picture Book", thinking that it is too well-regarded.

Since the announcement of the sales of "Taiwu Painting Volume", this sound has always existed, feel that "Taiwu Painting Volume" is touted by the water army, feel that it is the light of the Chinese summer wind, and it is the sales of many players who have no brains to pay for it.

But this claim is ridiculous.

The Marine Corps is not a Marine, in this world, the publicity and promotion of Zhong Ming is not as good as those big factories, nothing more than a video, looking for a few anchors, and those who are smashing tens of millions of advertising can not be compared; and in the past life, a small team really can not stand up to the online emergency, but also a penny of publicity funds can not be taken out, completely rely on a few UP master spontaneous propaganda.

It is said that the water army blew up, and it is obvious that even the most basic facts have not been understood.

As for the criticism of "Taiwu Painting" from the gameplay, it seems that the level is slightly higher, but it is still criticized in the wrong place.

If it is pointed out that some of the hard wounds of "Taiwu Painting", such as strange interaction logic, awkward interface design, missing some content, etc., these may indeed be the problems of "Taiwu Painting", but these problems are not enough to extinguish the fun of this game.

If we say, "Taiwu drawing volume" is not fun, I don't like it, so such a high sales volume is blown out, that is, the typical "I am the world" wrong view, because you do not like, there are others like, others are willing to pay for it, so there is such a high sales, it is such a simple truth.

Why you don’t like it doesn’t really matter.

Why other people like it is important.

Most of the people who criticize the "Taiwu Painting Book" have found some small baffles in this game, which is normal, after all, it is only a semi-finished product.Of course, for such a complex game, what the finished product will look like, perhaps even the main eggplant itself can not say, can only be improved step by step in the changes, but in the final analysis, these small flaws are not enough to deny the "Taiwu drawing volume" game itself.

Maybe these small flaws for most players, just deduct 1 point, 2 points, 5 points, but they are willing to give this game 100 points; and for a small group of people, these flaws will be deducted 50 points, 70 points in their hearts.

So in the final analysis, the data shows everything, and the sales and active number of "Taiwu Painting" have been enough to prove that it is a game that is interesting enough, and personal preferences are in front of the data, which is very powerless.

This long microblog of Zhongming is not to refute anything, but to tell all the players who like and support the "Taiwu Painting Roll": You like "Taiwu Picture Book" is not wrong, your taste is not wrong!

Wrong, those who think they can represent the taste of the players, standing on the commanding heights of the so-called "reviewers"!

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this chapter!